Constitutional Law for Criminal Justice
Sixteenth Edition
Home
Students
Weblinks
Downloads
Purchase
Home
›
Students
›
Chapter 6 Quiz
Chapter 6 Quiz
1.
The legal hurdles that confessions must pass in order to be considered constitutional stem from the following group of amendments:
First, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth
Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth
Fifth, Sixth, Tenth, and Fifteenth
Fourth, Fifth, Tenth, and Fourteenth
None
2.
What begins when police officers place a suspect under formal arrest or take a suspect into custody?
prosecutorial stage
Wong-Sun stage
McNabb-Mallory stage
custodial interrogation stage
None
3.
The free and voluntary rule requires suppression of confessions:
obtained by lying to the suspect that his confederate confessed and named him as the trigger man
obtained by interrogating a suspect nonstop for 36 hours without sleep
that result from a delusional mental illness that robs the suspect of the ability to make a rational choice
all of the above
None
4.
Miranda warnings are not required:
during traffic stops
to elicit biographical information needed for booking
to question a suspect who comes to the police station on his own and is told he is free to leave at any time
at any of the above situations
None
5.
The following case established the “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine:
McNabb v. United States
Miranda v. Arizona
Wong Sun v. United States
Mallory v. United States
None
6.
Whether a confession given after an illegal arrest is admissible depends on:
length of time between the arrest and the confession
presence of intervening circumstances
the purpose and flagrancy of the police misconduct
all of the above
None
7.
Police must observe Miranda procedural requirements only when:
they interrogate a suspect in custody
the interrogation takes place at the police station
the suspect has been charged with the offense that is the subject of the interrogation
all of the above
None
8.
Police may interrogate a suspect who had invoked the right to remain silent:
if the suspect signs a written waiver after being given a fresh set of warnings
after a 14-day break in custody
if counsel is present when the interrogation resumes
all of the above
None
9.
Confessions given by an accomplice implicating the accused are not admissible as evidence against the accused unless:
the corpus delicti requirement is satisfied
the accomplice passes a lie detector test
the accomplice is available for cross-examination at the trial of the accused
the accomplice was free of custody when he confessed
None
10.
In which of the following situation(s) would a suspect be considered in custody for Miranda purposes?
while being questioned during an investigatory stop
while being transported in a patrol car to the police station following his arrest
while being questioned in a jail cell by a police undercover agent posing as an inmate
None
11.
Waivers of Miranda rights are not effective unless:
warnings were administered no more than six hours before the confession
the suspect signs a written “advice of rights and waiver” form
the waiver is knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily given
all of the above
None
12.
There are several differences between the Miranda (Fifth Amendment) and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. These differences include:
The Miranda right to counsel is offense-specific; the Sixth Amendment right to counsel is not.
The Miranda right to counsel requires custody; the Sixth Amendment right to counsel does not.
The Miranda right to counsel may be waived, while the Sixth Amendment right to counsel may not.
The Miranda right to counsel is violated when incriminating statements are elicited by police undercover agents and informants; the Sixth Amendment right to counsel is not.
None
13.
The Sixth Amendment right to counsel:
applies only during custodial interrogations
requires police to notify the attorney of a person under indictment before questioning the person
requires police to obtain a waiver of the Sixth Amendment to counsel before questioning a person under indictment about any offense
none of the above
None
14.
A defendant under formal charges may give a valid waiver of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel:
only during contacts with the police that he or she initiates
only after consulting with an attorney
only if the waiver is in writing
none of the above
None
15.
An inadmissible confession may be used for purposes of impeachment only when:
the confession was freely and voluntarily given
the defendant takes the witness stand at his or her trial
the defendant gives testimony at the trial that is contrary to his or her pretrial confession
all of the above are present
None
16.
The fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine requires suppression of evidence derived from confessions obtained in violation of the:
the Fourth Amendment
McNabb-Mallory rule
Miranda rule
any of the above
None
17.
The warnings of constitutional rights under the Miranda v. Arizona case
do not have to be given when a person who is not in custody is asked a question by a law enforcement officer.
does not have to be administered to a person in custody when interrogation is not planned.
must be given to everyone who is arrested for a felony or a misdemeanor.
a and b only are correct
None
18.
Under Miranda v. Arizona, in a situation where the subject was free to leave at any time and was not under arrest:
police must offer the Miranda warnings so that the constitutional rights of the individual are properly respected.
police have a duty to offer the Miranda warnings since most people do not know exactly the substance of the warnings.
police have no duty to offer or explain the Miranda warnings because the duty does not arise untill both custody and interrogation exist.
a and b only are correct
None
19.
In a situation where a person in custody has invoked the protections offered by the Miranda warnings:
that person may not be subjected to any future interogation by police or other investigators.
that person may be asked to speak with officers after custody for Miranda purposes has ended for at least 14 days
the decision not to speak with officers extends until the subject has been to court for the first appearance
the decsions by the subject not to undergo interrogation lasts forever and cannot later be waived by the subject
None
20.
Consistent with the Miranda doctrine, when a subject is unaware that he or she is speaking with a police officer:
the warnings under Miranda need not be offered because the subject is not in custody for Miranda purposes.
warnings still must be offered in order to meet the test of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment
that warnings must still be offered since the officer may take the person into actual custody depending upon how the subject answers questions
b and c only are correct
None
21.
A confession must derive from improper government activity to be considered involuntary in the constitutional sense.
TRUE
FALSE
None
22.
Police may not interrogate a suspect who refuses to sign an advice of rights and waiver form.
TRUE
FALSE
None
23.
Congress modified the McNabb-Mallory rule by creating a six-hour safe harbor period. Confessions cannot be suppressed because of unnecessary delay in arraignment unless they are obtained more than six hours after an arrest on federal charges.
TRUE
FALSE
None
24.
The McNabb-Mallory rule is based on the Fifth Amendment and is applied to federal criminal cases.
TRUE
FALSE
None
Time’s up
←
Previous:
Chapter 5 Quiz
Next:
Chapter 7 Quiz
→