Home » Chapter 1

Chapter 1

This chapter sets the stage for the chapters to come. We explore what forensic science is (and isn’t) and what roles it plays in various legal systems and proceedings.  You will see how data produced by forensic examinations integrates into the body of an investigation and the importance of internal consistency of information. Through examples, you will see how competing stories and hypothesis develop regarding a criminal act and how forensic data helps investigators and the legal system sort through competing and contradictory versions of events.   

Data and analysis generated by forensic scientists is used to make decisions that impact individual lives and society.  We will examine quality management systems and practices used to ensure that this data is trustworthy, relevant and reliable.  The system is not limited to laboratory procedures; it extends to the scientists involved as you will see during the discussion of human factors and ethics.   

After completing this chapter and the associated exercises, you will be able to 

1.1 Define forensic science and explain its role in the justice system 

1.2 Differentiate between the adversarial and inquisitorial legal systems 

1.3 Identify the elements of a quality management system applied in a typical forensic laboratory and cite examples. 

1.4 Recognize the role of human factors in forensic analysis and reporting and evaluate their impact through example cases and scenarios. 

1.5 Distinguish between science and pseudoscience 

Question 1

Match the scientific concept to the appropriate defintion

Reproducibility
Peer review
Falsifiability
Evaluation of a claim by others working in the same field
Results must be presented in such a way that, if incorrect, other scientists could demonstrate that they are false
Experimental results should be accompanied by suffiencient information for others to repeat the experiment
Question 2

Match the term related to quality management to the appropriate definition

Standard operating proceduce
Chain of custody
Accreditation
Figures of merit
Quantitative metrics that show how a method should perform
Document describing how a test method is performed
The document that shows the history of a piece of evidence
Confirmation that a laboratory operates in accordance with set standards
Question 3

Match the decision to the admissibility standard it applies to

Judge as gatekeeper
General acceptance
Frye
Daubert
Question 4

Match the type of reasoning to the appropriate definition

Deductive
Abductive
Inductive
Using known data and information together to propose a hypothesis
Using existing data to generate hypotheses and predictions
Inference based on known factual data