Home » Chapter 1

Chapter 1

This chapter sets the stage for the chapters to come. We explore what forensic science is (and isn’t) and what roles it plays in various legal systems and proceedings.  You will see how data produced by forensic examinations integrates into the body of an investigation and the importance of internal consistency of information. Through examples, you will see how competing stories and hypothesis develop regarding a criminal act and how forensic data helps investigators and the legal system sort through competing and contradictory versions of events.   

Data and analysis generated by forensic scientists is used to make decisions that impact individual lives and society.  We will examine quality management systems and practices used to ensure that this data is trustworthy, relevant and reliable.  The system is not limited to laboratory procedures; it extends to the scientists involved as you will see during the discussion of human factors and ethics.   

After completing this chapter and the associated exercises, you will be able to 

1.1 Define forensic science and explain its role in the justice system 

1.2 Differentiate between the adversarial and inquisitorial legal systems 

1.3 Identify the elements of a quality management system applied in a typical forensic laboratory and cite examples. 

1.4 Recognize the role of human factors in forensic analysis and reporting and evaluate their impact through example cases and scenarios. 

1.5 Distinguish between science and pseudoscience 

Question 1

Match the scientific concept to the appropriate defintion

Reproducibility
Falsifiability
Peer review
Results must be presented in such a way that, if incorrect, other scientists could demonstrate that they are false
Experimental results should be accompanied by suffiencient information for others to repeat the experiment
Evaluation of a claim by others working in the same field
Question 2

Match the term related to quality management to the appropriate definition

Standard operating proceduce
Accreditation
Figures of merit
Chain of custody
Document describing how a test method is performed
Quantitative metrics that show how a method should perform
The document that shows the history of a piece of evidence
Confirmation that a laboratory operates in accordance with set standards
Question 3

Match the decision to the admissibility standard it applies to

General acceptance
Judge as gatekeeper
Frye
Daubert
Question 4

Match the type of reasoning to the appropriate definition

Abductive
Inductive
Deductive
Using existing data to generate hypotheses and predictions
Inference based on known factual data
Using known data and information together to propose a hypothesis

Question 1

Match the finding to how it was determined

No residue from shooting a gun was found on the suspect’s hands or clothing
The stains on the suspect’s clothing were blood
The brother called 911
The shoes that made the prints were at least two sizes smaller than those of the suspect
A gun was found at the scene
One set of fingerprints on the gun; not the suspects
A small smudge of what looks like red nail polish was found on the gun
Autopsy indicates that the weapon was held close to the victim when fired
Faint bloody shoeprints were found on the floor leading away from the victim and towards the front door
DNA results showed the blood to be that of the victim
The footwear impressions were from a woman’s athletic shoe
Forensic laboratory analysis
Crime scene investigator
Forensic analysis
Cell phone records
Crime scene investigator
Investigator
Medical examiner or coroner
Forensic analysis
Forensic analysis
Forensic laboratory analysis
Forensic laboratory analysis